We continue to study fractions. Today we are going to talk about comparing them. The topic is interesting and useful. It will allow the beginner to feel like a scientist in a white coat.

The point of comparing fractions is to find out which of two fractions is larger or smaller.

To answer the question which of two fractions is larger or smaller, use ratio operations such as larger (>) or smaller (<).

Mathematical scientists have already taken care of the ready-made rules that allow you to immediately answer the question of which fraction is larger and which is smaller. These rules can be safely applied.

We will look at all these rules and try to figure out why this is the case.

Comparing fractions with the same denominator

The fractions that need to be compared are different. The best case is when the fractions have the same denominators, but different numerators. In this case, the following rule applies:

Of two fractions with the same denominators, the one with the larger numerator is larger. The fraction with the smaller numerator is smaller.

For example, compare fractions 1612 and 1611 and answer which of these fractions is larger. The denominators are the same, but the numerators are different. Fraction 1612 has a larger numerator than fraction 1611. It means that 1612 is larger than 1611. That's how we answer. Answer with the bigger sign (>).

1613

This example can be easily understood if you think of pizzas that are divided into four parts. A 1612 pizza is bigger than a 1611 pizza:

1614

Everyone would agree that the first pizza is bigger than the second.


Comparing fractions with the same numerators

The next case we can get into is when the numerators of the fractions are the same, but the denominators are different. The following rule is provided for such cases:

If we compare two fractions with identical numerators, the one with the smaller denominator is larger. And correspondingly smaller is the fraction whose denominator is larger.

For example, compare fractions 1621 and 1622. These fractions have the same numerators. A 1621 fraction has a smaller denominator than a 1622 fraction. So the fraction 1621 is larger than the fraction 1622. That's how we answer: 1623

This example can be easily understood if you think of pizzas that are divided into three and four parts. A 1621 pizza is bigger than a 1622 pizza:

1624

Everyone would agree that the first pizza is bigger than the second.


Comparing Fractions with Different Numerators and Different Denominators

It often happens that we have to compare fractions with different numerators and different denominators.

For example, compare fractions 5/2 and 2/3. To answer the question of which of these fractions is larger or smaller, you must reduce them to the same (common) denominator. Then you can easily determine which fraction is larger or smaller.

Let's reduce fractions 5/2 and 2/3 to the same (common) denominator. Find the least common multiple (LCM) of the denominators of both fractions. The LCM of the denominators of fractions 5/2 and 2/3 is 6.

Now find the additional multipliers for each fraction. Divide the LCM by the denominator of the first fraction 5/2. LCM is 6, and the denominator of the first fraction is 2. Divide 6 by 2, and we get an additional factor 3. Write it over the first fraction:

1631

Now find the second additional factor. Divide the LCM by the denominator of the second fraction 2/3. LCM is 6, and the denominator of the second fraction is 3. Dividing 6 by 3, we get an additional multiplier of 2. Write it over the second fraction:

1632

Multiply the fractions by their additional multipliers:

1633

We came to the conclusion that fractions with different denominators turned into fractions with the same denominators. And we already know how to compare such fractions. Of two fractions with the same denominators, the one with the larger numerator is larger:

1634

The rule is a rule, but we'll try to figure out why 1636 is bigger than 1637. To do this, we highlight the whole part in the fraction 1636. In the fraction 1637, we don't need to isolate anything, because the fraction is proper.

After singling out the whole part of the fraction , we obtain the following expression:

After isolating the whole part in the fraction 1636, we get the following expression:

1638

Now it's easy to see why 1636 is bigger than 1637. Let's draw these fractions as pizzas:

1635

2 whole pizzas and 1639 pizzas, more than 1637 pizzas.


Subtraction of mixed numbers. Complex cases.

When subtracting mixed numbers, you sometimes find that things don't go as smoothly as you'd like. It often happens that when you solve an example, the answer is not what it should be.

When subtracting numbers, the subtractor must be greater than the subtractor. Only then will you get a normal answer.

For example, 10-8=2

10 - minuend

8 - subtrahend

2 - difference

The minuend 10 is greater than the subtrahend 8, so we have a normal answer of 2.

Now let's see what happens if the minuend is less than the subtrahend. Example 5-7 = -2

5 - minuend

7 - subtrahend

-2 - difference

In this case, we go beyond our usual numbers and enter the world of negative numbers, where it is too early, or even dangerous, for us to walk. To work with negative numbers, you need proper mathematical training, which we have not yet received.

If when solving subtraction examples you find that the minuend is smaller than the subtrahend, you can skip such an example for now. It is acceptable to work with negative numbers only after you have studied them.

The situation with fractions is the same. The minuend must be greater than the subtrahend. Only then will it be possible to get a normal answer. And to know if the fraction to be reduced is larger than the fraction to be subtracted, you need to be able to compare the fractions.

For example, solve example142314.

This is a subtraction example. To solve it, you must check to see if the fraction being minuend is greater than the fraction being subtrahend. 1621 is more than 1/3

1641

so we can safely go back to the example and solve it:

14231413

Now solve this example 1642

Check to see if the fraction to be minuend is larger than the fraction to be subtrahend. We find that it is smaller:

1643

In this case, it is wise to stop and not continue with further calculations. We will return to this example when we study negative numbers.

It is also desirable to check mixed numbers before subtraction. For example, find the value of the expression 15141.

First, we check to see if the minuend mixed number is greater than the subtrahend one. To do this, convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions:

1651

We got fractions with different numerators and different denominators. To compare such fractions, we need to reduce them to the same (common) denominator. We will not describe in detail how to do it. If you have difficulties, be sure to repeat the actions with fractions.

After reducing the fractions to the same denominator, we get the following expression:

1652

Now we need to compare fractions 1653 and 1654. These are fractions with the same denominators. Of the two fractions with the same denominators, the fraction whose numerator is larger is larger.

The fraction 1653 has a larger numerator than the fraction 1654. So the fraction 1653 is larger than the fraction 1654.

1657

This means that the subtractor 1655 is greater than the subtractor 1656.

1658

Which means we can go back to our example and boldly solve it:
15144


Example 3. Find the value of the expression 1661

Check to see if the minuend is greater than the subtrahend.

Convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions:

1662

We obtained fractions with different numerators and different denominators. Bring these fractions to the same (common) denominator:1663

Now let's compare fractions 1664 and 1665. The fraction 1664 has a smaller numerator than the fraction 1665, so the fraction 1664 is smaller than the fraction 1665

1666

This means that the diminutive of 1667 is also less than the subtractor of 1668

1669

This is guaranteed to lead us into the world of negative numbers. So it makes more sense to stop here and not continue calculating. We'll continue when we study negative numbers.


Example 4. Find the value of the expression 1671

Check to see if the minuend is greater than the subtrahend.

Convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions:

1672

We got fractions with different numerators and different denominators. Bring them to the same (common) denominator:

1673

Now we need to compare fractions 1674 and 1675. The fraction 1674 has a larger numerator than the fraction 1675. So the fraction 1674 is larger than the fraction 1675.

1678

This means that the subtractor 1676 is greater than the subtractor 1677.

1679

Therefore, we can safely continue to calculate our example:

16710

At first we got the answer 16711. We reduced this fraction by 2 and got a fraction 16712, but we were not satisfied with this answer either, so we separated the whole part in this answer. As a result, we got the answer 16713.


Exercises

Task 1. Compare fractions:
Solution:
Task 2. Compare fractions:
Solution:
Task 3. Compare fractions:
Solution:
Task 4. Compare fractions:
Solution:

Video lesson

Comments  

+1 #1 Lance Morales 2023-10-08 04:54
learned alot
Quote

Add comment

1. If you don't understand something, you can ask a question through the form below
2. If you find an error or inaccuracy, please describe it.
3. Positive feedback is welcome.


Security code
Refresh